Confidential
Counselling in Melbourne
RESET Professional
Counselling in Melbourne (CIM) — Treatment Summary Report

A — Participant and Program Details

NameJames Thorton
Program IDCIM_RESET_TEST001
Registered31-08-2026 09:54:59
ProgramRESET Professional — 10-Week Anger Management & Emotional Regulation Program

B — Attendance & Participation Record

Program structure: 10 weekly sessions (Week 0 Intake through Week 9 Closure), delivered online. The DAR-5 is administered at Weeks 0, 5 and 9; the CAS at Weeks 0 and 9.

WeekSession / topicDateStatus
0Intake: Assessment, Orientation & Goal-Setting — CAS + DAR-5 administered30-08-2026Attended
1Understanding Anger: What It Is and Where It Comes From07-09-2026Attended
2Triggers, Patterns and the Anger Cycle — Personal Mapping31-08-2026Attended
3Accountability Without Self-Blame: Ownership of Behaviour22-09-2026Attended
4Impact Awareness: How Anger Affects Others29-09-2026Attended
5Beliefs, Values & Stories — DAR-5 mid-program re-administration05-10-2026Attended
6Regulation Skills: In-the-Moment Strategies12-10-2026Attended
7Communication, Conflict and Connection19-10-2026Attended
8Consolidation: Healthy Relationships, Maintaining Change & Relapse Prevention26-10-2026Attended
9Closure: Debrief, Outcome Assessment & Certification — CAS + DAR-5 re-administered27-10-2026Attended

Sessions attended   10 of 10    Attendance rate   100%

Completion of this program requires attendance at a minimum of 8 of 10 sessions. Assessment rows (Weeks 0, 5, 9) are highlighted above.

C — Outcome Assessment: DAR-5 + Clinical Anger Scale (CAS)

Assessment framework: Two validated, free-access instruments are used in combination across three timepoints.

ToolItemsWhat it measuresClinical cutoff / rangeAdministered
DAR-55Frequency, intensity, duration, aggression, and interference with social functioning over the preceding 4 weeks.Score 5–25. Clinical threshold: ≥12 indicates problem anger warranting intervention.Weeks 0, 5 and 9
CAS21Intensity and maladaptive expression of clinical anger including work performance, sleep, decision-making and interpersonal relationships.Score 0–63. 0–13: Minimal · 14–19: Mild · 20–28: Moderate · 29–63: SevereWeeks 0 and 9

Both instruments are self-report. The psychologist's clinical observations in Sections D and E are an integral part of this report.

C1 — DAR-5 Scores Across Program

TimepointScoreClinical status
Week 0 (Intake)16 / 25Above threshold (≥12)
Week 5 (Mid-program)11 / 25Below threshold (<12)
Week 9 (Discharge)7 / 25Below threshold (<12)

C2 — CAS Scores: Intake vs. Discharge

CAS summaryWeek 0Week 9Change
CAS Total Score276↓ 21 pts
Severity bandmoderateminimal 

Clinical domain breakdown

DomainWeek 0Week 9
Work performance / cognitive3 / 61 / 6
Interpersonal interference / affective2 / 60 / 6
Sleep, decision-making, physical and behavioural12 / 241 / 24
Personal insight, awareness and commitment to change7 / 151 / 15
Risk factors / future focus3 / 123 / 12

Work performance / cognitive: improved from 3 to 1 / 6 (a reduction of 2 points).
Interpersonal interference / affective: improved from 2 to 0 / 6 (a reduction of 2 points).
Sleep, decision-making, physical and behavioural: improved from 12 to 1 / 24 (a reduction of 11 points).
Personal insight, awareness and commitment to change: improved from 7 to 1 / 15 (a reduction of 6 points).
Risk factors / future focus: unchanged at 3 / 12.

Domain mapping confirmed by the treating psychologist, N. Lindley (AHPRA PSY0001127336), prior to use in this report.

C3 — Outcome Visualisations

25120Threshold16117Week 0 (Intake)Week 5 (Mid-program)Week 9 (Discharge)
Chart 1 — DAR-5 trajectory.
27/ 63Week 0 — Intake6/ 63Week 9 — Discharge
MinimalMildModerateSevere
Chart 2 — CAS intake vs. discharge.
EngagementInsightAccountabilitySkill applicationCommunicationMotivation443224
Rating scale index — wording pending clinical confirmation
12345
Chart 3 — Clinical Observation Profile.

C4 — Clinician's Interpretation of Assessment Results

RESTEST RESTEST RESTEST

Note for referring party: Both instruments are self-report. The psychologist's clinical observations in Sections D and E are an integral part of this report and should be read alongside the quantitative findings above.

D — Clinical Observations: Engagement & Progress

Rating scale: 1–No insight/engagement · 2–Minimal · 3–Moderate · 4–Good · 5–Excellent/consistent.

DomainRatingClinical observation
Engagement & attendance4 / 5Good
Self-awareness & insight4 / 5Good
Accountability & ownership3 / 5Average - needs work
Skill acquisition & application2 / 5Unaware and lacking
Communication & relational skills2 / 5Poor - needs work. Biggest change to improve anger
Motivation for sustained change4 / 5Excellent

E — Clinical Summary Narrative

TEST TEST TEST

F — Clinical Recommendations & Maintenance Plan

Needs further one-on-one sessions to continue improvement

G — Completion Recommendation

✓Program completed with demonstrated engagement and meaningful insight development. No further structured intervention recommended at this time.

H — Certification & Signature

I confirm that the information contained in this Treatment Summary Report is accurate to the best of my professional knowledge and has been prepared in accordance with the ethical guidelines of the Australian Psychological Society (APS) and the standards of AHPRA.

Reporting psychologist: Neoma Lindley, BA (Psych) PG Dip (Psych) · AHPRA: PSY0001127336

Signed: 15-09-2026 · Practice: Counselling in Melbourne (CIM)

IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER. This Treatment Summary Report is a clinical document.